When behaviour, regulation and learning access concerns persist, the issue is rarely a shortage of strategies.
Schools may already have plans, referrals and specialist advice in place. The harder task is to understand why the current pattern is continuing, what the evidence means in this particular setting, and what needs to change in day-to-day provision.
I help schools bring those pieces together, identify what matters most and turn a complex picture into clearer, more workable decisions.

I begin by reading the whole picture carefully.
I look across pupil need, regulation and communication, routines and environment, peer dynamics, adult response and existing provision.
The aim is to distinguish what matters from what does not, understand how the relevant factors are interacting, and identify where change is most likely to improve learning access, regulation and participation.
Sometimes the most useful change lies in provision. Sometimes it is an adult response, a pressure in the environment, an unmet communication or regulation need, or something important that has not yet been recognised.

When good advice has not yet translated into workable provision
Schools can have a great deal of information and still lack a response that works consistently.
Plans, specialist reports and recommendations may all be sound. The challenge is translating that understanding into provision that holds together across real classrooms, real timetables and different adults.
My work often sits between assessment and implementation. I bring together relevant specialist advice, direct observation, school evidence and professional discussion to identify where the picture does not yet join up, what the remaining gap is, and what needs to happen differently in practice.
I do not duplicate specialist assessment. I help schools make better use of what is already known, while recognising when further assessment or specialist input may still be needed.
This work is most useful when concerns have become layered or persistent: behaviour is escalating, learning access is becoming more restricted, suspensions are increasing, a reduced timetable is being considered or is already in place, or staff are carrying increasing uncertainty about how to respond.
The picture may include autism, ADHD, SEMH, communication or sensory needs, attachment-related needs or the effects of trauma, with or without a diagnosis.
The label is not the organising principle. What matters is understanding which needs, conditions and interactions are most relevant to what is happening now, and what that means for provision.

I’m Kamal Riar, a Behaviour & SEND Consultant. My professional judgement draws on more than 20 years of experience across classroom teaching, behaviour support, specialist autism and SEND advisory work, staff training, school improvement and independent consultancy.
That experience spans individual pupils, groups and classrooms, leadership and whole-school work, including pupils at risk of exclusion, teacher and senior-leader coaching and multi-agency involvement.
It means I understand both the complexity of pupil need and the demands on the adults and systems around them. Good recommendations have to do more than make sense on paper. They need to be educationally sound, proportionate and possible to sustain within the realities of school life.
The aim is a clearer professional view of what matters most, where provision or learning access is breaking down, and what is realistic to change now.
Natasha V., SENCO, Space Studio West London, Hounslow

If you would value an experienced independent view on a complex pupil, group or whole-school concern, send a brief outline of what is happening.
Copyright © 2026 Creative Potential - All Rights Reserved.